My general research interest is in molecular structure-function relationships as applied to motility. The organizational level is that of large macromolecular complexes--the interface of single-particle biochemistry/biophysics and cell biology.
The particular areas of research are:
The long-term goal of this project is to understand the energy transduction of ATP into mechanical work in muscle. The atomic structure of the myosin head, whic h was recently determined by Ivan Rayment and coworkers, provides a structural framework within which structure-function questions can be asked. As in any motor , it is reasonable to expect that some parts of the system will be moving, and that some of these motions will be directly resulting in the generation of force. The problem might be trivially summarized as where, when and whether?
Current projects include:
B. Ca2+ activation of muscle contraction: signal transduction
Muscle contraction is initiated by the binding of Ca2+ to the thin filament. This signal somehow results in a changed interaction between the myosin head and actin. Since Ca2+ binds to troponin C, a protein which is not in direct contact with either myosin or actin, the signal must be propagated v ia the other regulatory proteins, troponin I, troponin T and tropomyosin. The nature of these interactions is not well understood. In solution Ca-binding protei ns containing E-F hands analogous to troponin C undergo large structural changes. The conformational freedom of troponin C in complex with the proteins of the t hin filament is greatly restricted and changes are more subtle. They involve changes in the mobility of constituent proteins and their relative geometries. The questions asked and the general strategy to answer them is similar to those described above for energy transduction--identify and describe the motions within th e proteins, and correlate them with thin filament activation. The technical challenge of this area is somewhat greater than for the acto-myosin system: the vari ous components have to be isolated (or expressed) and labeled in solution followed by the reconstitution of the regulatory system. The advantages of this approa ch are many fold: (a) structural changes can be tracked through different levels of organization: isolated proteins, binary, ternary complexes, thin filaments a nd finally muscle; (b) probes are more specifically targeted including doubly labeled complexes for fluorescence energy transfer; (c) new targeting sites are in troduced by site specific mutagenesis.Current projects include:
C. Instrumental and Methodology Development
The EPR technique is unique insofar that it provides orientational and motional information about specific sites within a molecule. It has a sensitivity advanta ge over NMR, (as little as 100 picomoles of sample can be used) and a spectral resolution advantage over optical techniques, (since the molecules oriented diffe rently in space are resonating at different magnetic fields). My lab is involved in the development of various aspects of EPR:
Current projects include: